All cultures
have different rules or laws regarding the killing of other people and the
punishment they shall receive. In Western culture today, laws are written in
stone that prevent people from killing another person. There are very strict
laws that will punish a person who is to break these rules of killing, such as
life in prison or the death penalty. In contrast, the Yanomamo have no written
language and no formal laws. They violate general rules and customs whenever
personal gain can be achieved. Since they don’t have a written form of laws as
a guiding principle, the rules are broken on a near daily basis. Many different
types of violence are a result from the lack of written language and law.
In the Yanomamo
culture, the most common reason for killing is the act of revenge on a previous
killing. The main reason they cite this revenge is because of “women.” The
people who are out for revenge must be careful of an ongoing, viscous circle of
revenge back in their direction. The Yanomamo see the revenge killing as an
advantageous counterbalance to the killing that was done to them earlier. In
addition, the Yanomamo explain that a village that has a reputation for swift
retaliation is attacked less frequently, and as a result they do not have as
many mortalities. Also, the Yanomamo culture sees revenge as a social benefit,
giving men who take part in revenge as having higher reproductive success and
higher marital success. These two benefits to the act of revenge show why it is
so important in the Yanomamo culture.
Unokais: Those who have killed. In the Yanomamo culture, one who kills
must follow a ritual purification called unokaimou.
One purpose of this ritual is to avert any supernatural harm on oneself
from the soul of the victim. The benefit of being a unokais means you are fierce and respected as one who enacts
revenge. Another benefit of the unokais
is the higher reproductive success than a non-unokais. This greater success in reproduction is due to the greater
success of finding a mate. This is one reason a man would rather become a unokais
rather than a non-unokais. The
benefit of being a non-unokais would
be the benefit of a less risky life of killing and revenge. They live a life
with fewer mortal risks than the unokais.
Revenge killing
is an integral part of the Yanomamo culture. It has relationships with all
aspects of life, including political structure, social status, kinship, and
marriage and reproduction. Each of the Yanomamo villages has certain descent
groups. Each descent group has one or more political leaders, or patas. These patas can have many wives and a lot of children. They are the
headsman of the group and all of them in the given study are unokais. In the tribal world warfare is the
extension of kinship obligations by violence because the political system is
organized by kinship. Revenge
killing has a big influence on the social status of the Yanomamo culture. Those
who participate in revenge killings are seen as higher up on the social ladder.
They have more power and influence on social organization among the village
people. Kinship relates to the revenge killings and how people are related to
each other in their culture. A person is related to another if at least one
genealogical connection between them exists. Most individuals, however, are
related to their kin in multiple ways. In most villages well over 80% of the
members are related to more than 75% of the village. Data from the article
shows that members of the village are related to each other more closely than
half cousinship. Killing among the Yanomamo culture is very important for the
loss of individuals. Nearly 70% of all individuals (males and females) age 40
or older have lost at least one close genetic kin due to violence, and most
(57%) have lost two or more. This is a very important factor to why the village
people lose so many family members. Revenge killing has a huge affect on the
marriage and reproduction behavior of the Yanomamo. Those who participate in
the revenge killing, the unokais,
have a higher rate of marital success and a higher rate of reproductive
success. Both of these facts are due to them having greater success finding a
mate to marry and reproduce with. They find greater success finding mates
because they either appropriate them forcibly from others, or by customary
marriage alliance arrangements in which they seem to be more attractive as
mates than non-unokais. As you can
see above, revenge killing constitutes a major part of the Yanomamo culture.
I think we
must have laws against “anti-social” behavior, like killing other people. Even
though these actions are considered ones that no one should want to do, they must
have laws instated against them because violence is a potent force in human
society and may be the sole driving force of human evolution. As organisms on
Earth, we are implanted with traits to promote our survival and reproduction,
which means we may have to kill to revive these human needs. Also, I think some
people who have emotional disorders can kill other people without realizing the
importance of the crime of taking a life. Laws must be present to remind them
of the importance of taking a life. I think we should have more stringent laws
on anti-social behaviors. This should make it less likely for people to commit
these heinous crimes.
I see that you also picked up on that most killings were over women. I fell like their culture has a lot to do with having and protecting women. The unokais marry more and they have more kids. So it almost appears if they do a good job of revenge killing to protect their kin they are liked by more people. It could mean that women are at the center of revenge killing.
ReplyDeleteHey Tanner!
ReplyDeleteI pretty much see eye to eye with you on this topic of violence and revenge killing in the Yanomamo tribes. So I had a question about the unokais. Those who are unokais are sought out more by the women of the tribe because they believe they will protect them and provide more. Do you think that those unikais that are favored more, thus having a higher reproductive fitness, will be passing down genes that will map the brain to be more violent if given enough time?
I liked the way you descibed the natural instinct that we have for our survival. I belive that killing people is wrong, society teaches us that from childhood. But as you said "As organisms on Earth, we are implanted with traits to promote our survival and reproduction" we would kill to survive. Laws are there to justify survival from revenge.
ReplyDeleteWe can kill legally in our society. We kill to protect certain ideals and freedoms. We killed Osama BinLaden out of revenge for killing our people.We might have different justifications that seem relevent to us, but we might be somewhat like the Yanomamo tribe.
ReplyDeleteAre the Yanomamo really breaking their own rules regarding killing? Can they kill whenever and whomever they wish? Or are they actually following a specific set of guidelines/rules (albeit unwritten) that lays out how these revenge killings occur? Just because the laws don't look like ours doesn't mean they aren't laws. I question your "written in stone" statement, since there are exceptions to our laws on killing and we need judges to figure out when killing is or is not justified.
ReplyDeleteGreat discussion on how this system impacts other aspects of this culture. Very well presented.
Great final discussion on the biological nature of violence. Yes, we have social laws to protect us from those who would give in to perhaps instinctual behaviors. Well done.